- - ------- Message 1 From garzogli@fnal.gov Wed Mar 20 09:23:59 2002 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:23:55 -0600 From: Gabriele Garzoglio To: condor-admin@cs.wisc.edu Subject: Re: [condor-admin #3580] problem during GSI authentication while submitting a job Dear all, The new version of CondorG, which uses the Globus 2.0 libraries, works fine. I'm glad we've exposed this backward compatibility issue: I'm sure it'll arise again if people will use the DOECA certificates with Globus 1.1.4 : do we want to write a few line at http://envisage.es.net/ ? If there is a warning there, I've missed it. Thank you all for your prompt support. Gabriele On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 22:04, condor-admin response tracking system wrote: > > Gabriele Garzoglio writes: > > > 2)/DC=net/DC=es/OU=Certificate Authorities/OU=DOE Science > > > Grid/CN=pki1 > > > 3) > > > /0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.25=net/0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.25=es/OU=Certificate Authorities/OU=DOE Science Grid/CN=pki1 > > > > These look like the same cert; this is the oid def for "dc". > > > > What, if anything, does condor do for x.509 handling? > > > > * From: Michael Helm > > Condor-G uses the Globus GSI libraries from Globus 1.1.4. My suspicion > is that the GSI changed between 1.1.4 and 2.0. A new version of > Condor-G that uses Globus 2.0 libraries is now available for download > off our website. Try that version. - - ------- Message 2 From helm@fionn.es.net Wed Mar 20 09:36:38 2002 To: Gabriele Garzoglio cc: condor-admin@cs.wisc.edu, Igor Terekhov , Rod Walker , Ruth Pordes , Doug Olson , WEJohnston@lbl.gov, MRThompson@lbl.gov, m_helm@lbl.gov Reply-to: helm@fionn.es.net Subject: Re: [condor-admin #3580] problem during GSI authentication while submitting a job In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:23:55 CST." <1016645035.2504.46.camel@fndapq.fnal.gov> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:36:32 -0800 From: Michael Helm Received: from localhost by localhost Message-Id: <"Qti49.A.1aG.miMm8"@fionn> Gabriele Garzoglio writes: > Dear all, > the new version of CondorG, which uses the Globus 2.0 libraries, works > fine. I'm glad we've exposed this backward compatibility issue: I'm > sure it'll arise again if people will use the DOECA certificates with > Globus 1.1.4 : do we want to write a few line at > http://envisage.es.net/ ? If there is a warning there, I've missed it. Thanks for working thru this -- will do.